Metamodern Art, Society, and National politics


A very quick intro to metamodernism

Olafur Eliasson; One-way colour tunnel, 2007; Installation view: Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago, 2009; Photo: Nathan Keay / Courtesy of Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago © 2007 Olafur Eliasson

Olafur Eliasson; One-way colour passage, 2007; Installation view: Museum of Contemporary Art , Chicago, 2009; Photo: Nathan Keay/ Thanks To Gallery of Contemporary Art Chicago © 2007 Olafur Eliasson

In this article, I commemorate the kinship between us, mostly political-philosophical metamodernists, and you, the cultural-critical movement more detailed to aesthetics, style, and film. I know I can talk not just for myself when stating that we political lobbyists like you men and your job, both the artists/designers described as metamodern and the academics that explained the fad (rats in the cellar, you recognize who you are ☺). The great part is, in an intellectual and social context, you don’t even need to like us back. We can still use your ideas, your taste and your perceptiveness to change culture for the better.

DUTCH RENAISSANCE

Apparently, these words by cultural philosophers Timotheus Vermeulen and Robin van der Akker, appearing in a 2010 paper in Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, hit a chord:

“Ontologically, metamodernism oscillates between the contemporary and the postmodern. It oscillates in between a contemporary enthusiasm and a postmodern irony, in between hope and moody, in between naïveté and knowingness, compassion and apathy, unity and plurality, totality and fragmentation, pureness and uncertainty.”

I believe this quote constitutes the core of what may be called a little Dutch Renaissance in its own right. These …

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *